Cultural dimensions of two countries

Different cultures deal with the anxiety that this can bring. The transition of a soul to a new life is very important so both traditions observe specific rituals at the time of dying and the handling of the body. Many members of the community lent helping hands.

Describe how the two countries are different in terms of Hofstede’s five cultural dimensions.

However, this lady was reluctant to voice any opinion regarding this, as she felt that her own well-being was not so much significant considering the entire group. They have strong beliefs and expectations for behavior.

The hierarchy present is merely for convenience. The community is more collectively oriented, whereas the engineer belonged to a culture that is more individualistic. Hiring and promotions take into account the employees of the group. Buddhism is also a set of philosophies for living.

The group provides help and safety, in exchange for loyalty. Their culture is very resistant to innovation. When a common culture prevails, personnel management is not difficult since everybody has a common conception of right, wrong and accepted behavior.

This is completely at odds with the standards set forth in the Patient Self Determination Act http: Trinidad scores low in the dimension of Individualism with a 16 Hofstede. Relationships between employers and employees are seen in moral terms.

It deals with a cultures search for virtue. The fundamental issue here is how a society handles inequalities among people. In the US, people tend to talk about their successes and achievements. First, his mother had died and he was arranging for the funeral. Provide clear instructions, processes, and procedures.

The main authority lies with the chief, who should decide on the best course of action. In the US, people tend to talk about their successes and achievements.

Cultural Dimensions of Two Countries Essay

Cultural Influences on Conceptions of Death and Dying. Typical individualist cultures include the U. Second, he had an affair with a girl in a neighboring village and was more inclined to meet her than perform his duties.

However, when the other women of the community were asked, one suggested a flat design so that the lady with the walking problem could collect her water easily. So far as the individualism index is concerned, a substantial gap exists between Eastern and less developed countries on one hand and Western and developed countries on the other.

The fundamental issue here is how a society deals with the fact that the future can never be known: The people are very precise, punctual, hard working, and busy.

The United States is a very individualistic culture. Uncertainty Avoidance Index UAI The Uncertainty Avoidance dimension expresses the degree to which the members of a society feel uncomfortable with uncertainty and ambiguity. Again, Anglo countries, Japan, and European countries such as Switzerland, Austria and Hungary have high masculinity scores.

Considering this, positioning as an employer in the USA high on masculinity is quite different from doing so in Scandinavian countries and the Netherlands low on masculinity.

It happens — sometimes we simply fail, in the moment, to express sufficient sensitivity and warmth when critical decisions must be made. When a common culture prevails, personnel management is not difficult since everybody has a common conception of right, wrong and accepted behavior.

In the US, people tend to talk about their successes and achievements. Succeeding at this brings reward, failing at it brings punishment. American business measure their success with financial statements issued quarterly. Individualism versus Collectivism IDV The high side of this dimension, called Individualism, can be defined as a preference for a loosely-knit social framework in which individuals are expected to take care of only themselves and their immediate families.

Uncertainty Avoidance Uncertainty Avoidance is how a society reacts to the fact the future is not known. Describe how the two countries are similar in terms of Hofstede’s five cultural dimensions. Describe how the two countries are different in terms of Hofstede’s five cultural dimensions.

Given a scenario where two organizations, one located in each country, are to do business with each other, provide recommendations that would be beneficial.

Cultural Dimensions of Two Countries According to Geert Hofstede there five dimensions of culture. The five dimensions are Power Distance, Individualism or Collectivism, Masculinity-Femininity, Uncertainty Avoidance, and Short or Long-Term Orientation.

A Tool That Maps Out Cultural Differences is that most people tend to emphasize just one or two, at most three, dimensions of cultural and she rated a large sample of countries on these.

The theory of Hofstede’s cultural dimensions constitutes a framework revolving around cross-cultural communication, which was devised by Geert Hofstede. The dimensions collectively portray the impact of the culture ingrained in society on the values of the members of that society. They also describe the relationship between these values and behavior, with the help of a structure based on.

Introduction. Geert Hofstede’s seminal book, Culture’s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values, along with its reissue and expansion and related journal articles, is without question the most influential work on culture in the field of international turnonepoundintoonemillion.com two versions of the book alone have been cited over 9, times in the Web of Science Database.

Long-Term Orientation is the fifth dimension of Hofstede which was added after the original four to try to distinguish the difference in thinking between the East and West.

Cultural dimensions of two countries
Rated 4/5 based on 8 review
Cultural Intelligence Center